A U.N. Peacekeeping Mission Is Afghanistan's Best Hope

By A Mystery Man Writer

For better or worse, the United States military is leaving Afghanistan. Proponents for withdrawal argue the U.S. has done all it can militarily in the country, has more pressing security interests elsewhere and may do more harm than good by staying. Critics say the power vacuum the U.S. is leaving behind will reignite a civil war and open the door to ethnic cleansing, gender apartheid and state failure. Both views have merit, but the choice is not between these options alone. Yes, the U.S. record of nation-building in Afghanistan is poor. And yes, power vacuums and state fragility breed insurgencies, []

Beyond Emergency Relief: Averting Afghanistan's Humanitarian Catastrophe

U.N. peacekeeping mission in Mali set to end on June 30

Why the U.S. Should Stay Invested in Postwar Afghanistan's Infrastructure

UN Peacekeeping: 70 Years of Service & Sacrifice

Why France Will Have to Step Up on U.N. Peacekeeping Missions

Women in Peacekeeping: A Status Report — Peacebuilding Deeply

The US and the Taliban are inching toward an Afghanistan peace deal - Vox

Blood and hope in Afghanistan: A June 2015 update

Could Multinational Peacekeepers Prevent Worst-Case Outcomes in Afghanistan? - War on the Rocks

US starts troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in hope of ending 'forever war

©2016-2024, travellemur.com, Inc. or its affiliates