Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size

Download scientific diagram | Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size (OS) measured across transverse sections and (B) scale size (SS) measured from the focus to the anterior edge. Regression lines depict linear (dashed lines) and logarithmic fits (solid lines). For A, linear: OS = 1.89 + 0.09 · FL, r 2 = 0.94; log: OS = 3.29 · log e FL – 6.32, r 2 = 0.95. For B, linear: SS = –0.12 + 0.07 · FL, r 2 = 0.88; log: SS = 2.38 · log e FL – 6.07, r 2 = 0.89.  from publication: Longitudinal Length Back-Calculations from Otoliths and Scales Differ Systematically in Haddock | Parallel macrostructure analysis of otoliths versus scales was conducted on Georges Bank Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus sampled in spring 2011 to test whether annuli widths of both structures yield comparable estimates of back-calculated length at age. While generally | Otolith, Otolithic Membrane and Fish | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

Larval and juvenile Longfin Smelt diets as a function of fish size

Relationship Between Otolith Measurements with the Size of

Forklift Forks: Everything You Need to Know - Conger Industries

Transverse section of the sagittal otolith (left) and scale impression

Frontiers Bomb Radiocarbon, Otolith Daily Increments and Length

Biometrics of Aquatic Animals

Fishes, Free Full-Text

Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size

Marine Drugs, Free Full-Text

Queen triggerfish Balistes vetula: Validation of otolith-based age

Monthly percentage of opaque edges observed in modern samples of

Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith